Einsichten eines Wissenschaftsnarren

narrLeseempfehlungen zur Laborjournal Kolumne:

 

 

 

1 Wie originell sind eigentlich Ihre wissenschaftlichen Hypothesen?

Baker M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature. 2016 May 26;533(7604):452-4. doi: 10.1038/533452a

Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ES, Munafò MR. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475

Button KS. Statistical Rigor and the Perils of Chance. eNeuro. 2016 Jul 14;3(4). pii: ENEURO.0030-16.2016. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0030-16.2016.

Dirnagl U. Sind die meisten Forschungsergebnisse tatsächlich falsch? Laborjournal 2014 7/8:38-41

Goodman SN, Fanelli D, Ioannidis JP. What does research reproducibility mean? Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jun 1;8(341):341ps12. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027

Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124.

Kimmelman J, Mogil JS, Dirnagl U. Distinguishing between exploratory and confirmatory preclinical research will improve translation. PLoS Biol. 2014 May 20;12(5):e1001863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001863.

Mogil JS, Macleod MR. No publication without confirmation. Nature. 2017 Feb 22;542(7642):409-411. doi: 10.1038/542409a.

Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.

Rheinberger HJ Experiment, Differenz, Schrift. Zur Geschichte epistemischer Dinge. Basilisken-Presse, Marburg/Lahn 1992, ISBN 3-925347-20-8.

 

und hier geht’s zum Blog:cropped-buzz.jpg